FP&A Stories - 🚫 3 ways finance can say "No" without killing the conversation
Hello Reader 👋Last week I was in France for a client session. I always enjoy going there. The food, the energy, the conversations. But this time, something unexpected happened before I even got to the workshop. I arrived at the hotel after a long drive. The parking was supposed to cover 24 hours but the ticket I got started before my arrival. I asked the receptionist to understand the situation. What followed was one of the most frustrating interactions I have had in a long time. Not because of the answer. Because of how he delivered it. What followed was a conversation that went nowhere fast. He kept saying no, each time with less patience and more bad faith than the last, without once explaining the actual constraint or suggesting any way forward. I could have paid the 10 euros without a second thought. But his way of saying no made me feel like I was fighting a wall. I left the hotel on the defensive, which is a strange state to be in over a parking fee. And somewhere on the road after that, I thought: business people feel exactly this way when finance says no. So this week, we talk about how to say "no" in finance without killing the relationship, the conversation, or your credibility So take a coffee, sit down and read FP&A Stories just like 18k other readers This week in FP&A Stories 🚫 3 Ways Finance Can Say "No" Without Killing the Conversation
✅ And sometimes, finance needs to learn to say yes
🚫 3 ways finance can say "no" without killing the conversationIn almost every workshop I run, the same frustration surfaces at some point.
And somewhere in that exchange, you realise the two sides are not actually disagreeing on the outcome but they are disagreeing on how the conversation went. The "no" itself is rarely the problem (finance says no for legitimate reasons all the time) What creates friction is when the no arrives without context, without empathy, and without any indication that the other person's request was actually heard. That hotel receptionist was not wrong to see the hour on the ticket and determine I was wrong. He was wrong in every other way. The moment finance becomes the wallWhat makes this dynamic particularly damaging is that it tends to compound quietly over time. A business unit gets a flat no once and moves on. It gets another one three months later and starts working around finance instead of with it. By the time finance wonders why it is only being consulted at the end of conversations rather than the beginning, the reputation has already been built Finance has to say "no" sometimes but not bringing anything else can be a problem. No context, no acknowledgment of the situation, no indication that the request was genuinely considered. And that absence speaks louder than the answer itself. 3 ways to say "no" that keep the conversation aliveOver the years, working with finance teams across very different industries and cultures, I have found that the difference between a no that damages relationships and a no that builds them comes down to three things. 1️⃣ Acknowledge before you answer Before explaining why something cannot happen, show that you understood what was being asked and why it matters to the person asking. It's just a question of education and being credible as a partner. A business leader who feels heard is far more receptive to a difficult answer than one who feels processed. Something as simple as "I can see why this makes sense from your side, and here is what makes it difficult from ours" changes the entire dynamic of the conversation. 2️⃣ Explain the real constraint (further than the rule) Rules exist for reasons: find them. When finance cites a policy without explaining the logic behind it, the message received is that finance does not actually understand the business. The moment you explain the real constraint (the cash position, the board commitment, the risk threshold), the other person can engage with the substance. They might push back, but it becomes a real conversation rather than a bureaucratic dead end. That is a much better place to be. 3️⃣ Offer a path, even a narrow one A no with a door left open lands very differently from a no that closes the room entirely. That door does not need to be a full solution. It can be a phased approach, a resubmission in the next planning cycle, a smaller version of the request that fits within current constraints, or simply a clear explanation of what would need to change for the answer to become yes. What matters is that the person leaves the conversation with something to work with, not just a wall to walk into. ✅ And sometimes, finance needs to learn to say yesIn January 2022, I was still at Proximus, starting to seriously think about whether I was ready to take the leap and build something of my own. It was a period of a lot of internal questions. And at some point during that period, our CFO posted a short LinkedIn video (one of those end-of-year messages, informal and to the point). Someone off-screen asked him what his advice was for finance in 2022. His answer was immediate: learn to say yes more often. I do not know exactly why that stayed with me. Maybe because it was simple. Maybe because it came from a CFO. Maybe because I was, at that very moment, trying to say yes to my own next chapter. But that sentence followed me, and I still think about it today. He was pointing at something real. Finance teams that are known for saying no accumulate a reputation that eventually limits their influence.
That is the slow death of a business partner function. But there is a risk on the other side too, and I have seen it just as often: the finance people who say yes to everything tend to become the most overloaded people in the room. They get a reputation for being easy to work with, which means everyone comes to them. And eventually, the burnout follows. Being the person who never says no is not a sustainable strategy either. The real skill is knowing which answer the situation actually calls for. And then delivering that answer in a way that moves the relationship forward rather than ending it. Final Thought In finance, the word "no" is not the problem. What surrounds it is. When a no arrives without context or acknowledgment, it does not communicate rigour. It communicates distance. And distance, in a function that is trying to be a strategic partner, is the one thing you cannot afford. The goal is not to say yes to everything. It is to make sure that whatever you say, the other person understands why their situation was actually considered. Think of the last time you said no to a business request. Did you explain the real reason, or did you cite the policy? Hit reply and tell me. I read every message and reply to all of them. That's a wrap for this week See you next week! P.S. After 17 years in FP&A, Consulting and Leadership, I’ve coached and trained finance teams across industries, from consulting and manufacturing to tech, media, and global logistics. If you want to sharpen your own storytelling skills or bring this work into your team, here are a 3 ways can work together:
If you're unsure which option fits best, reply to this email. I’ll point you in the right direction. |